When real estate values sag, some buyers get severe buyer’s remorse. Some of them, rightly or wrongly, repudiate the purchase, refusing to close. I call them “runaway buyers.” When runaway buyers register a caution they should expect the court to remove the caution and order costs against them.
On Friday, Feb 2/18, the article “I Want My Deposit Back” appeared in The Globe And Mail (Ontario Edition). It discusses a case of mine where a real estate buyer backed out of the purchase, refusing to close. The buyer then, because of the deposit, registered a caution against title to the sellers’ land.
I went to court for an Order to remove the caution from title. The judge decided that the buyer should never have registered the caution. There was no proper basis for the caution. It was for an improper purpose – to gain leverage in the dispute about the deposit.
The judge ordered the buyer to pay costs on a substantial indemnity scale to compensate the sellers for their legal expense in going to court for the Order to remove the caution.
Note that the judge did not rule on whether the buyer had a good basis for repudiation. That issue is for another day.
Other buyers also recently got the idea of registering a caution to press for return of the deposit. If this is a trend it is a bad one.
Globe subscribers can read the article online: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-estate/toronto/backing-out-of-a-real-estate-deal-a-cautionary-tale-against-strong-arm-tactics/article37801532/
I have now done an interview about the material set out in my post Crooked Real Estate Vendor — A Few Ideas For Real Estate Agents. You can see it here:
I recently spoke to Allan Fok and his colleagues at Century 21 Times Square Realty Inc. Brokerage in Richmond Hill, Ontario, on the topic of Crooked Real Estate Vendor — A Few Ideas For Real Estate Agents. My fellow lawyer Jeff Jiehui Li also spoke, on tax law issues. After the presentations the group went to the Premiere Ballroom & Convention Centre, where we lunched amid the statues and giant paintings.
Here is an outline of the points I covered:
Beware the crooked real estate vendor. Whether you are acting for the vendor or the purchaser, the crooked vendor is a danger.
a) You can be sued for passing on a misrepresentation to the other side – make sure to be clear in writing that you are passing on what the client says, it is not something you are saying;
b) You can be sued by your own client for negligence or breach of contract;
c) If you pay out based on a bad cheque, you or your firm could be out of pocket.
a) Vendor is not as represented, e.g. identity theft;
b) Vendor AND purchaser are not as represented, e.g. inflating the value, cheque fraud;
c) Property is not as represented.
4. Vendor. Who are you really dealing with?
a) Get photo ID, preferably 2 pieces of government-issued ID, and copy it yourself or have your own staff copy it;
b) Use http://www.canada411.ca for a reverse lookup on any phone number given to you;
c) Search your and your firm’s records for references to the person;
d) Make it plain in writing to both vendor and purchaser which side you act for, and that you do not act for the other side;
e) If any part of the purchase price flows through you, do not be rushed into sending the funds to the vendor before absolutely sure that the cheque is good. Clever fraudsters can make very plausible cheques that can even fool a bank for a while.
a) If you act for the purchaser follow the same steps as shown above in the “Vendor” area. It would be prudent to check out both the vendor and the purchaser;
b) To protect a purchaser you can also try one or more of
i. Clauses in the Agreement;
ii. Vendor take-back mortgage (better for normal breaches than for fraud);
iii. Personal guarantee (again, better for normal breaches than for fraud);
iv. Searches on anything searchable, such as rent review status;
v. Property inspection; and
vi. Title insurance (making sure to comply with all insurer requirements).
a) Legal status of the property, e.g. “legal and unregistered” rents;
b) Physical condition of the property. Get an inspection, and consider seasonal factors;
c) Beware of misrepresentation by silence.
Documentation is key. “Well I told him that” might sound lame at trial if there is no documentation of it. So:
a) Keep copies of documents;
b) Verify discussions and events by e-mail and keep a copy of the e-mail;
c) As things do not always happen while you are at your computer typing e-mails, take handwritten notes of discussions and other events as they progress, preferably in a hardbound notebook. Do not rip any sheets out of the notebook.
For more detail you can ask me, or have me speak to your group.