Here are some of the commonest parts of a contract that you need to know about, for contracts in the common law jurisdictions, such as most of Canada, the United States, and Great Britain.
Parties
It takes at least two parties to make a contract. Who the parties really are is vitally important but not always obvious.
Suppose you negotiated with good old Joe of Joe’s Fish & Bait Limited, and Joe signs for the corporation. The corporation would be bound by the contract but, unless there was a special clause in the contract saying so, or other special circumstances, good old Joe himself would not be bound.
So Joe usually would not be liable if the corporation breaches the contract, even if it was Joe himself who decided that it would breach the contract.
Even sophisticated businesses with millions of dollars at stake can make this mistake. Consider the great salad oil scandal of decades ago. A crooked businessman, Anthony “Tino” De Angelis, borrowed millions based on American Express warehouse receipts verifying that he had a sea of salad oil. He actually had nowhere near as much salad oil as the warehouse receipts said. The lending kept going for years despite warning signs, including tip-off warnings about the fraud, because the lenders trusted American Express.
When the fraud finally came to an end American Express pointed out that the receipts came from a subsidiary, not from the main American Express company. This let American Express negotiate a payment to the defrauded lenders that was a fraction of what it would otherwise have had to pay.
Consideration
This can be complex. The key point is that for a binding contract all sides have to give something of value. Value can take many forms, such as money, real estate, binding promises to do things…
Some lawyers would disagree but in my opinion it is useless to write into the contract “magic words” like “payment of $1 and other good and valuable consideration”. Was the $1 really paid, and can you prove it? What is the “other good and valuable consideration”? The wording is not harmful but it might well not save the contract if it is unclear what the real consideration is.
Decades ago I represented a buyer. He bought out the other shareholder in a corporation by assuming the debts and handing over a miniscule cash payment, in coins. I actually photocopied those coins to help me prove, if it ever became an issue, that my client had really paid.
Term & Renewal
Some contracts cover only a specific event, like a simple sale of property, but others cover a lengthy period, a “term”.
Understand what the term is, because it can make the difference between a good deal and a disaster. A restaurant with only two years left in the term of its lease would be much less valuable than one with 4 years left to go plus the option to renew for up to two five-year terms.
Written?
Not all contracts have to be in writing, but having it written certainly helps if you need to prove exactly what the deal was.
Some contracts must be in writing. For example Ontario’s Statute of Frauds, and similar laws in other places, require that a contact to sell land, or a lease, needs to be in writing.
Is the FULL deal written?
A partly written contract can be even more dangerous than a completely unwritten one. If what the other side gets is written out in full detail some of what you are supposed to get is left out of the written contract, you are in trouble.
Arbitration clause
If the contract has an arbitration clause then some or all disputes related to the contract might have to be dealt with by an arbitration and not by a judge in the regular courts.
Governing Law & Jurisdiction
If all the parties to a contract are in one place, and the contract itself is to be carried out in the same place, you probably don’t need such clauses.
But it is not always that simple, so clauses can set out what kind of law applies, or what courts will handle any problems coming from the contract.
So the contract could theoretically have a clause saying problems arising from the contract are to be handled by the courts of Albania (jurisdiction) applying the law of Italy (governing law). More often the jurisdiction clause and the governing law clause will point to the same place, such as the courts of California applying the law of California.
Force Majeure
Force majeure clauses set out what circumstances beyond the control of a party would suspend or end that party’s obligation to fulfil the contract. In those contracts containing them, the clauses might for example cover one or more of war, expropriation, crime, and natural disaster.
Conclusion
You must understand that I have listed only some of the contract clauses you might need to pay attention to. Also, you might have a special situation that is an exception to the above general comments.
If you would like to talk with me about contracts or other business law issues, or could use some legal help, you can contact me by phone at 416 929 7202 or by e-mail at afrank@FrankLaw.ca.
Also, you can get a copy of the above article in .pdf format, suitable for sharing with your contacts electronically or by a paper printout, by e-mailing a request to me at afrank@FrankLaw.ca
Canadian Pizza Magazine, a publication for the pizza trade, has published an article by me covering some of the key points to consider in reviewing and negotiating a commercial lease: The ins and outs of renting — How to sign a lease that protects you.
You do not have to be in the pizza business for this to matter — leasing mistakes can kill a small business start-up, and even hurt well-established businesses, in any industry.
Here is a link to that article on the Canadian Pizza web site: The ins and outs of renting.
Forget the eye of newt. Put your black cat up for adoption. The wise know that the real magic is in words.
Not just any words — the right words.
At least, that is what I gather from copywriter Sarah Jo Wood of Evolving Advisors Inc. in Toronto, Ontario. She was kind enough to send me a list of words to avoid. Apparently, readers who see these words run screaming into the night, or at least shudder and turn away.
Here are the words of woe that she says can jinx your writing:
See how I can use those words, underlining them as I go:
As a business and trial lawyer writing on business and law, it is hard to see how I can meet my obligation to my readers without using those “wrong” words. Suppose I want to analyze a difficult decision to sign a contract to buy or sell in order to earn. I must consider what may worry the business person more than death — failure. A business deal gone bad can cost money; what you owe you usually must pay. There are ways to lower the risk of liability and loss, but worry is a cost of doing business. If you spend your life in a fantasy you should expect to fail.
Maybe that paragraph sounds negative, but could I say those things without most of those words?
That said, Sarah does have a point. Words have more than their literal meaning. They have associations and implications, mood and tone. They pick things up from the company they keep like butter can pick up tastes in a refrigerator.
Mark Twain famously said, “The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug.”
I have to admit that looks nothing like a bug of any kind.
In advertisements people never “spend,” they “invest.” Of course, vacation trips and other luxuries are consumption, not investment, but the advertisers use the more appealing word anyway. I suspect they know what they are doing.
Suppose you want to influence your audience’s attitude towards a man. There are many ways you could accurately refer to him. Depending on your audience and what attitude you want, you could call him the biker, the Harley rider, the motorcyclist, Dr. Maniple, the pediatrician, the doctor, the baby doctor, and so on.
For an average middle-class audience the words from “Dr. Maniple” are more positive than “biker” or “Harley rider.” The word “pediatrician” could come across as stuffy, pretentious, or confusing to some audiences but clear and appealing to medical people. Those who have had good dealings with Harley-Davidson motorcyclists might find “Harley rider” very positive.
These differences can matter in court, in novels, in advertising, in fact in any communication.
Even synonyms do not mean exactly the same thing. For example, someone who is “prosperous” probably does not have as much as someone who is “wealthy.” Haute cuisine is not described as “yummy.” A “lovely” woman is more refined than a “hottie.”
Consider word choice and business names.
“Ben & Jerry’s” seems friendlier and less corporate than “A Division of Unilever.” Ben & Jerry’s now actually is a division of Unilever but does not sell Unilever ice cream. It just would not sound as good as Ben & Jerry’s.
What about a string-of-initials name? The idea is that since IBM is a famous corporate giant your small business startup will impress with a name like RKZZP Corp. But such a name can make your branding efforts harder. Who can even remember “RKZZP Corp.”?
The string-of-initials name does not make the famous corporate giant impressive; the fact of being a famous corporate giant lets it get away with using a dud name.
Word choice matters but it is not all that matters. Shakespeare, the great master of word choice, wrote “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet”. I would add, an “unauthorized effluent release” would smell as bad.
But put the right words with the right substance, and now you have magic.
You yearn for your business to survive and thrive. But what if your small business start-up flops, either early or after the business gets big?
There is a way to get limited liability protection So the creditors cannot go after your house, your car, your savings…
Consider Salomon. You might ask, “how can any salmon, no matter how delicious and packed with omega-3 fatty acids, give me limited liability protection?” Even with lemon butter, or teriyaki sauce, or a maple-soy glaze, it seems like too much to ask. Excuse me, I’m getting hungry —
I’m back. Where was I? Oh yes, Salomon, which actually has nothing to do with salmon despite the similar spelling.
In Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd., [1895-9] All E.R. 33, Britain’s House of Lords saw a corporation created for limited liability. One man owned almost all the shares and ran the business. Even so, the corporation counted as a separate legal entity from him. So it, and not the man, was liable for its debts.
This is still good law today. With a few exceptions, like fraud and some torts, the debts are the corporation’s alone.
Limited liability is not a trick — it is why they invented corporations in the first place.
For limited liability you first have to create a corporation. But just incorporating is not enough for solid protection. You should also organize, maintain, and use your corporation.
Once you have articles of incorporation you should organize. This includes holding a first directors meeting to make by-laws, appoint officers, and so on. You can ask a lawyer to help you take all the steps — not just those I mentioned.
Maintenance includes holding annual shareholders’ meetings, keeping the Minute Book up-to-date, registering changes with the government, and other steps. Again, a lawyer can help.
Use the corporation for your business.
Use its exact legal name on documents. Documents like contracts, purchase orders, invoices, business cards, and letters. If you rarely mention your corporation, creditors will argue that you are personally liable.
When I say “exact legal name”, I mean it. Not a similar name, the exact name.
“Joe’s Fish Emporium” is not the same as “Joe’s Fish Emporium Limited”. The first name does not say there is a corporation. So Joe, or whoever runs the business, might be personally liable. The second name says there is a corporation. Probably there is limited liability.
Do not use “Joe’s Fish Emporium Unlimited” because it sounds cooler than “Joe’s Fish Emporium Limited.” The word “Unlimited” implies that there is no limited liability.
“Joe’s Natural Fish Emporium Limited” or “Joe’s Fish Emporium Ltd. Corp.” also create risks if the exact name is “Joe’s Fish Emporium Limited”.
Surprisingly often I have seen people use different names from the exact name. They run a needless risk.
Make sure you know the exact name. The articles of incorporation will not always tell you, because the name could have changed. The safest way is to search with the government.
If you want to use a different name — even a little different — change the name properly and register the change.
Buying shares is not the only way to put money into your corporation. You can also lend money to it. You can even take security for the loan.
This opens up interesting possibilities. I wrote about some in The Bottom Line, a magazine for accounting and financial professionals. To see the article go to: Can Your Client Be Saved By A Private Receivership?
With wise use of a corporation you should not face financial ruin even if an unexpected disaster swamps your business. You could keep eating, and plan your business comeback.
###
P. S. My thanks to Paul Tobey of http://www.trainingbusinesspros.com/, who made a suggestion that improved this post.